For the original document, see The Antioch Declaration.

"The disciples were called Christians first at Antioch"
(Acts 11:26)

Introduction

 

Just as the apostle Paul at Antioch "opposed him [Peter] to his face because he stood condemned" (Gal. 2:11, CSB) for compromising the gospel of Jesus Christ by subjecting it to racial barriers, so this brief statement opposes the ideas of some contemporary leaders and influencers seeking to introduce anti-gospel racial categories into the church. This Antioch Declaration was not conceived or developed in haste but after much prayer, thought, counsel, and soul-searching. Our task is an unpleasant one, but like the apostle Paul's, it is necessary, even when other Christians are involved. When the gospel once for all delivered to the saints is itself at stake, we dare not remain silent.

Just as Paul at Antioch confronted Peter to his face about his mistaken views on racial barriers [1], we are confronting other influencers about their anti-gospel racial views. [2]

Thus, as confessionally Reformed, Lutheran and Evangelical believers from a broad range of churches, we have come together to identify and resist a rising tide of reactionary thinking emerging on the fringes of our own circles. Those especially at risk of being led astray by wolves clothed as shepherds are among the younger generations of Christian men whom we love and care about deeply. As believers, we must always build and act upon the foundation of Scripture. This must include all our engagement in socio-cultural and political life. To react to cultural developments in a manner that denies the functional and final authority of the Word of God over us is to move against the rule of Christ and His Kingdom. Since God does not show favoritism (Rom. 2:11), the Word of God must be faithfully applied everywhere and to all.

We have identified a rising tide of reactionary thinking among our fringe following.

We are doing this to prevent others (young Christian men, mostly) from being led astray by wolves in sheep's clothing.

This clearly implies that while we must never criticize the political right simply because the progressive left demand it, to declare that we will never have "enemies on the right," simply indicates to Satan and his hordes what form his next attack on the people of God should take, and from which direction it should come.

We are not criticizing these wolves because the progressives demand it.

But if we say that we will never have enemies on the right, we are sending a message to Satan telling him how to attack us.

In order to avoid a diabolic ditch on both sides of the socio-political road, and to advance God's Kingdom purposes, we therefore offer the following declarations and invite signatories.

To avoid a diabolical ditch on the right and left, we are asking for others to sign this declaration.

"By the evidence of their own scriptures they bear witness for us that we have not fabricated the prophecies about Christ . . . It follows that when the Jews do not believe in our scriptures, their scriptures are fulfilled in them, while they read them with blind eyes . . . It is in order to give this testimony which, in spite of themselves, they supply for our benefit by their possession and preservation of those books [of the Old Testament] that they are themselves dispersed among all nations, whether the Christian church spreads . . . Hence the prophecy in the Book of Psalms: Slay them not, lest they forget your law; scatter them by your might” (Augustine, City of God 18.46).4"

(The introduction ends with a quote from Augustine's City of God for no apparent reason.)

Augustine says that every time the Jews fail to see Jesus in the scriptures, they are fulfilling the scriptures, while reading them with their blind eyes.

But rather than kill the Jews, we are supposed to scatter them with our might.


The Declaration

 

WE DENY that the Kingdom purposes of Christ and requirements of His Word can be equated with the seating positions of political actors during the French Revolution, or that the modern antithesis between right and left is equivalent to the antithesis that God established in the Garden of Eden between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent, the kingdom of darkness and kingdom of light.

Christ's kingdom is not the same as the seating arrangements during the French Revolution. [3]

And the difference between right and left is not the same as the difference between the seeds of the woman and the serpent in the Garden of Eden.

WE AFFIRM that the modern neo-pagan secular project is bankrupt and desperately trying to hold the social order together by means of a fraudulent narrative and anti-Christian worldview. As a result, the lies of secular elites in all spheres have necessarily grown increasingly evident and outrageous.

The modern world is anti-Christian.

WE AFFIRM that, as a consequence, some young men in the West have become jaded and cynical, with an element among them now rejecting or doubting the received account of virtually anything. The great danger is that now, instead of acting on the basis of revealed truth in Christ, they are in the unhappy position of reacting by choosing between opposing sets of lies.

Because of this, some young men in the West have become jaded and cynical, rejecting and doubting virtually everything.

They are choosing between two sets of lies, rather than acting on the revealed truth of Christ.

WE DENY that disillusionment and resentment over the lies one has been told is adequate preparation for standing in the truth and resisting a new set of lies.

Hearing lies does not prepare people to know the truth and reject other lies.

WE AFFIRM that disillusionment and resentment make a person vulnerable to deception and frequently prepare the ground for accepting new falsehoods, setting the stage for further disillusionment.

Disillusioned and resentful people are easily fooled into believing lies.

WE DENY that neo-pagan secularism with its utopian religious motive arose as a consensus after World War II. Rather, it manifests itself as the political outworking of the so-called Enlightenment during the French Revolution and gradually won the hearts and minds of Western nations, being well expressed in the political philosophies dominating Europe prior to the outbreak of the two great global conflagrations.

Secularism didn't just suddenly appear in 1945.

It began on May 5, 1789.

WE AFFIRM that the aftermath of World War II served as a cultural tipping point for the secular narrative and its myth of religious neutrality which has functioned as a centerpiece for these lies. It has promoted this deception with triumphal hubris throughout all Western institutions, insisting on both an idolatrous religious pluralism and a mandatory globalist cosmopolitanism.

But 1945 was a tipping point.

That's when the secular world began to value religious pluralism.

WE AFFIRM that a contradictory and pervasive thread of self-doubt and self-loathing has also formed an essential part of this secular narrative following the horrors of World War II. Thus, when the reactionary right challenges the "post-war narrative" they are not necessarily breaking free of it—this is a reflex that the post-war narrative itself has nurtured. The narrative thrives on an unstable mix of white imperiousness and white guilt.

Everyone in the secular world began to hate themselves in 1945.

This was caused by a mix of white supremacy and white guilt.

WE DENY that any particular view of the Allied leaders, their strategies, or tactics during World War II should be a test of Christian orthodoxy. WE FURTHER DENY that this civic adiaphora may be expanded to cover malice, vain glory, race-baiting, antisemitism, treachery, bitterness, or hatred. These issues are entirely distinct.

It's okay for Christians to approve or disapprove of the tactics and strategies of Allied leaders during World War II.

But malice, pride, racism, antisemitism, hatred, etc. are unacceptable.

WE DENY that it is possible to harmonize the racial and antisemitic theories of Adolf Hitler and neo-pagan doctrines of the Nazi cult with the gospel of Christ and the teachings of scripture.

It's not possible to harmonize the teachings of Christ with the racial and antisemitic beliefs of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

WE AFFIRM that if the superabundant, diverse forms and veritable glut of evidence - detailed in diaries, documented records, firsthand testimonies of eyewitnesses, extensive photography and videography all provided within living memory - for the deliberate mass destruction of millions of Jews by the Nazis does not amount to historical certitude for what specialists call the Holocaust, then the science of history itself is called into question.

It's a historical fact that Millions of Jews were killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

WE AFFIRM that there is a vital biblical difference between the self-loathing of men in the grip of disillusionment over a failed idol, and the true repentance of the Christian man.

There's a biblical difference between Christian men and and men who hate themselves because of a failed idol.

WE DENY that it is possible to recover an ethic that honors our fathers and their momentous sacrifices while actively and openly dishonoring them.

It's impossible to honor our fathers while dishonoring them.

WE AFFIRM that as the secular liberal edifice crumbles, many will refuse to turn to Christ. As the "strong gods" inevitably return, godless influential figures will arise the same way Theudas did (Acts 5:34-39).[1] The temptation for some Christian leaders will be to ape such methods for the sake of clicks, followers and the ephemeral notion of 'influence.'

As the secular world crumbles, many will refuse to believe in Christ.

Meanwhile, godless men like Theudas (Acts 5:34-39) will arise, whom some Christian leaders will imitate for the sake of clicks and giggles.

Copyright © 1999-2025
The Skeptic's Annotated Bible

Send comments to Steve Wells
at swwells(at)gmail.com